unknown / Codex

Frustration with the need for auto-accept in planning mode, which is seen as unnecessary.

Problem statement normalized from the linked evidence

CANDIDATE VIEW · NOT A PUBLISHED OPPORTUNITY

Qualification checklist

Gate decision: Aug 15, 2026

At least 3 independent users2 / 3

NOT MET

At least 2 independent discussions1 / 2

NOT MET

At least 1 supporting signalInsufficient data

NOT MET

Observed signals

Users2

Discussions1

Mentions2

Active days1

Source coverageGitHub

TrendUNKNOWN

First seenAug 02, 2026

Last seenAug 02, 2026

Why the gate is holding

Fewer than 3 independent users
Fewer than 2 independent discussions
No supporting growth, persistence, intent, workaround, alternative, blocked-workflow, or cross-source signal

Competition research, commercial scoring, and Build Gap analysis do not run until this gate passes.

Source evidence

2 evidence records

github · MEDIUM · Aug 02, 2026

openai/codex

> [@shijie-oai](https://github.com/shijie-oai) Why the fuck do we need auto-accept FOR PLANNING MODE? IT'S MADE FOR PLANNING. IF U WANT THE AGENT TO WORK BY ITSELF, JUST SEND PROMPT DIRECTLY. This is absolutely on-point.

COMPLAINT

GregPeden · openai/codex

View original ↗

github · MEDIUM · Aug 02, 2026

openai/codex

@shijie-oai Why the fuck do we need auto-accept FOR PLANNING MODE? IT'S MADE FOR PLANNING. IF U WANT THE AGENT TO WORK BY ITSELF, JUST SEND PROMPT DIRECTLY.

COMPLAINT

lime1-agent · openai/codex

View original ↗